🔗 Share this article

Europe felt a moment of respite on Monday, as the crisis sparked by the presentation of a new 28-point plan for ending the war appeared – temporarily – to have been defused. A senior US official spoke of "substantial progress" after diplomatic discussions in Geneva. On Monday night, Moscow made its countermove: an extensive attack of rocket attacks on Kyiv.

The Rhythm of Peace Talks and Military Action

The succession of contrasting events captured the harsh reality of the recent timeframe. By day, negotiation efforts are waged: positive announcements are released from different nations. Immense energy is expended on restraining certain initiatives. By night, the Kremlin forcefully demonstrates the world that, for them, military action persists as the key method for achieving "peace".

Nighttime Reality

As Russia's attack progressed into the early hours of Tuesday, the present situation of Ukraine's vulnerability was exposed. Ukraine is equipped to monitor projectile deployments from across the border, a ability enabled by current data. From vantage locations, military aircraft that had been scrambled to intercept incoming guided weapons flew past – modern combat jets provided to Ukraine by Western partners.

Moments later, Kyiv's anti-aircraft weapons activated: several firings targeted at a incoming threat. This was a sophisticated defense system at work, most likely provided by partner states. Every launch jolts you unexpectedly, rattling buildings. The instant of fear quickly becomes resigned acknowledgment: possibly the hostile projectile won't hit its mark this time, protecting urban areas from ruin and additional electricity failures.

Continuous Dangers

Following this, a large-caliber weapon engaged a drone close by, part of a rapid response unit – most likely imported technology. Unfortunately, the shots failed to hit the opposing UAV – it continued its flight toward its destination.

Periodically, this persisted until dawn. Kyiv greeted the early updates: seven people killed, devastation and utility failures in multiple buildings as a result of the nocturnal offensive. As always, everyone still continued their routines – living the war. But those full day encapsulated Ukraine's essential dependence on international aid – a need that neighboring countries are clearly incapable to substitute in the near term.

Unsuccessful Negotiations

The comprehensive proposal from Washington sparked intense emotion, controversy and serious worry – and briefly redirected concern from Ukraine's most significant graft case in years. Yet, we have witnessed similar scenarios, after prior negotiation attempts and international summits.

Every new initiative from Washington follows the identical sequence: a negotiation push against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with partner nations, effectively counters. They manage the tension but never actually win the battle. This pattern will, certainly, persist.

Tactical Assessments

It is tempting to accuse particular leaders of persistently promoting Moscow's conditions. But that does not seem to be the complete picture. American leadership functions according to a principle understood by international relations experts: you cannot win at the negotiating table what you have been unable to protect through force. The White House presumes that it is impossible to pressure the Kremlin to relinquish the areas that it already controls in Ukraine's occupied territories.

The challenge is that while recognising this factual reality, Washington does minimal to discourage Russia, through words or deeds, from thinking that the situation will not shift further in its favour in the near future.

Conflicting Perspectives

Therefore, Moscow is certain that duration works to their advantage – that Ukraine and its supporters are approaching exhaustion. Their reason to agree to terms that does not give them the greatest potential benefit is close to zero. There may be multiple initiatives to end hostilities, but they will carry on as long as Russia's leader remains completely certain in the outcome.

On the contrary, Kyiv believes that Ukraine can still hold out, gradually sacrificing people and territory but averting a total frontline collapse until situations evolve in its favour.

Present Conditions

Objectively, there are no genuine requirements for a armistice. Now, subjective factors are entering the equation: leadership ambitions to mediate resolution and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and Kyiv's double obstacles – on one hand, not to alienate a key ally, and on the other, to mobilize citizens around the flag against any initiative Kyiv finds unacceptable, so that their priority does not shift toward internal issues. And although their mission will now be much harder after current events, it remains very improbable that this will change their overall approach.

These conflicting dynamics are influencing discussions.

Summary and Prospects

It took a only one week to kill the proposed articles of the most recent proposal. Aggressive and erratic handling of the matter by US administration, opposition by Ukraine and the other European countries, along with soothing efforts of representatives, and finally, current information leaks, all did their job.

While new plans based on established approaches are imminent, Kyiv, London and other European capitals should reach an essential realization: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to counter political attacks from Washington that are founded on Moscow's terms and demonstrate specific hesitation to alter the situation, if they maintain solidarity and enhance their military capacity at a much faster pace. If they do, neither political nor armed coercion will be able to break them. In the meantime, Ukraine's ability to counter nocturnal attacks will, for the foreseeable future, mainly require continued Western support.